Wednesday, June 29, 2011

News-Jayalalithaa against PM falling under Lokpal radar

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa against PM falling under Lokpal radar

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa said last Monday that the proposed anti-graft Lokpal bill should exclude the prime minister from its ambit as it would undermine his authority and could be used by foreign powers to destabilise the government.
In an interview to Times Now channel, she said: 'The proposed Lokpal bill should exclude the prime minister as he is already covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Any misconduct by the prime minister can be investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation.'
'Lokpal could be used by foreign powers to destabilise the government,' she said.
According to her, bringing the prime minister under the Lokpal's ambit would dent his authority as he will be on the defensive when Lokpal would investigate a complaint.
Jayalalithaa said the functioning of the Lokpal, with powers to probe complaints against the prime minister, would pave the way for a parallel government which will undermine the prime minister's authority.
She said the state would formulate its view only after the bill is placed before parliament. Referring to her offer of support to the central government last November, Jayalalithaa said it was not a standing offer. The one-time offer was made in a particular context, in a particular situation and that situation did not exist now.

News-Prime Minister Says that the Government committed to take steps to deal with black money

Government committed to take steps to deal with black money: Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh
Government is committed to taking all possible steps to deal with black money, tax evasion and corruption in the country. Speaking to a group of select editors in New Delhi today Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said, that it is not a one-shot operation. Dr. Singh said, he had no hesitation in bringing his office under the purview of Lokpal. However, many of his Cabinet colleagues felt that bringing the institution of Prime Minister under Lokpal would create instability

Monday, June 27, 2011

Lokpal existing and proposed a comparision

Lokpal Draft Bll Existing and Proposed by the Civil Society - A Comparision and few doubts
Existing System ( Ex)
System Proposed by civil society ( Pro)
1
Ex No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take permission from the same bosses, against whom the case has to be investigated.
Pro Lokpal at centre and Lokayukta at state level will be independent bodies. ACB and CBI will be merged into these bodies. They will have power to initiate investigations and prosecution against any officer or politician without needing anyone’s permission. Investigation should be completed within 1 year and trial to get over in next 1 year. Within two years, the corrupt should go to jail.
2
Ex No corrupt officer is dismissed from the job because Central Vigilance Commission, which is supposed to dismiss corrupt officers, is only an advisory body. Whenever it advises government to dismiss any senior corrupt officer, its advice is never implemented.
Pro Lokpal and Lokayukta will have complete powers to order dismissal of a corrupt officer. CVC and all departmental vigilance will be merged into Lokpal and state vigilance will be merged into Lokayukta.
3
Ex No action is taken against corrupt judges because permission is required from the Chief Justice of India to even register an FIR against corrupt judges.
Pro Lokpal & Lokayukta shall have powers to investigate and prosecute any judge without needing anyone’s permission.
4
Ex Nowhere to go - People expose corruption but no action is taken on their complaints.
Pro Lokpal & Lokayukta will have to enquire into and hear every complaint.
5
Ex There is so much corruption within CBI and vigilance departments. Their functioning is so secret that it encourages corruption within these agencies.
Pro All investigations in Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be transparent. After completion of investigation, all case records shall be open to public. Complaint against any staff of Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be enquired and punishment announced within two months.
6
Ex Weak and corrupt people are appointed as heads of anti-corruption agencies.
Pro Politicians will have absolutely no say in selections of Chairperson and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta. Selections will take place through a transparent and public participatory process.
Ex Citizens face harassment in government offices. Sometimes they are forced to pay bribes. One can only complaint to senior officers. No action is taken on complaints because senior officers also get their cut.
Pro Lokpal & Lokayukta will get public grievances resolved in time bound manner, impose a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay to be deducted from the salary of guilty officer and award that amount as compensation to the aggrieved citizen.
8
Ex -Nothing in law to recover ill gotten wealth. A corrupt person can come out of jail and enjoy that money.
Pro- Loss caused to the government due to corruption will be recovered from all accused.
9
Ex-Small punishment for corruption- Punishment for corruption is minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years.
Pro -Enhanced punishment - The punishment would be minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment.
Other questions to be answered to the Public are
How the Chair persons and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta are appointed?
What will be process of selection?
If it is by nomination by elected representatives of people, wouldn't it amount to political appointment?
If it is by election by people, wouldn't it be a political election?
How do we avoid political intervention in the selection process in a Democratic country?
How do we segregate corrupt and non-corrupt politicians and keep away the corrupt ones from the selection process of Office Bearers of Lokpal?
What checks we can implement to avoid autocratic way of functioning of these bodies, if they are not accountable to people?
Are we heading for a new system of government, by curtailing the power of governance of the people's representatives in the democratic system?
If we appoint a parallel authority to decide on matters of importance, how effective would be our government?
Wouldn't it mean that we do not trust our political system?
If we don't trust our political leaders, who is to be blamed? the leaders or the people who elect them?
If the people are to be blamed, where is the change to be effected? in the system or in the society?
If the change is to effected in the society, how it is to be achieved? who will take the leadership?










Courtesy: An E-Mail from Chet Ram

Sunday, June 26, 2011

More questions and answers on Draft Lokpal Bill


Why shouldn’t the Jan Lokpal Bill be subject to broad public participation and discourse?
During the drafting stage, the Jan Lokpal Bill is being exposed to public debate like no other bill in the past has. Numerous suggestions from various groups and individuals who have come forward to participate have already been included and will continue to do so till the date of finalization. A dedicated website, lokpalbillconsultation.org, is gathering inputs from the entire country. Public consultations are planned to be held throughout the country. Pamphlets are being printed for handing out to various public institutions and communities.
The bill drafting committee should not include members from the civil society. Bypassing democratic processes for political expediency however desirable the outcome, may be detrimental to democracy itself. 
Generally, bills presented in parliament are drafted by government bureaucrats and other non-elected people, and rarely by the politicians (people’s representatives). In the drafting committee for the Jan Lokpal Bill, with equal representation from civil society and government, the step is only more democratic, not less.
Most importantly, the parliament will ultimately debate and vote on the draft, so who drafted the bill becomes less important. Committees for drafting bills have several times taken members from the civil society in the past – Maharashtra has enacted 7 acts like this.
As a side note, most bureaucrats have little field experience in social issues, and are confined to think only of authoritarian/undemocratic structures and processes. Several laws passed after independence like the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, POTA, etc. are evidence of such autocratic thinking. Thus, a genuine people’s participation in the drafting committee will only result in more open and democratic national laws.
The drafting panel doesn't have a broad representation and doesn't include other eminent people or activists.
First of all, Anna said he will travel around the country collecting all ideas for an effective bill. A dedicated website, lokpalbillconsultation.org, is gathering inputs from the entire country. Public consultations are being held in different parts of the country. So, not being on the panel shouldn't prevent anybody including eminent people from submitting their ideas.
Second, can NAC be said to have a broad-based representation? How do members of NAC get chosen? Is there a transparent process for that? What is the constitutional validity of NAC?
Why not include other parties in the drafting panel instead of the Bhushans father-son duo?
The chief criterion for selection of the civil society members in the drafting committee was to select those people who had drafted the Jan Lokpal Bill. They are the only people who can explain all the background reasoning for having the various clauses and the interrelationships among them. People unfamiliar with the thought process behind drafting the bill will be unlikely to explain various subtleties of this complex legislation during the JDC’s meetings.
In addition, Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan are both eminent jurists whose services are much needed in reviewing and drafting the final bill. The fact that they happen to be father and son is irrelevant. Charges of nepotism are meaningless because nepotism implies that the one of them was able to get the other accepted to the panel using their influence.
Government’s representatives in the committee are the true representatives of the people of India.

Not true. There is no member of the opposition in the government’s team of five. Opposition parties, also elected democratically just like the ruling party, form an essential constituent of a functioning democracy, and thus should have been included from the government’s side.




Courtesy: Indiaagainstcorruption.org

Polpal Bill to be finalized after consultation with Political Parties

Draft Lokpal Bill to be finalized after consultations with political parties: Govt.
The government has said the draft of the Lokpal Bill will undergo changes after consultations with political parties and other members of the civil society. Speaking to PTI in an interview, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal one of the key members of the joint committee for drafting the Lokpal Bill emphasised that the draft bill prepared by the five ministers was not the final bill. Mr Sibal said it will go through changes after getting inputs not just from other political parties but also other members of civil society. The minister said civil society is not to be used again in drafting of law. The government is holding a meeting with political parties on the issue on July 3. Mr Sibal maintained that Anna Hazare and his associates had wanted to create an authority outside the system which would be accountable to nobody. Mr Sibal asserted that this could not be allowed to happen.

Saturday, June 25, 2011

News-CWC backs government stand on Lokpal Bill

Congress Working Committee backs the Government's approach to the Lokpal Bill
Congress Working Committee today backed the government's approach to the Lokpal Bill. Party spokesperson Janardhan Dwevedi said that the Working Committee held the unanimous view that the Government should not succumb to the pressure exerted by what he described as self proclaimed leaders of people who do not respect democratic institutions. The meeting discussed political situation in the country and harmonised the views of party leaders on the Lokpal issue. Speaking on the Lokpal issue, senior party leader and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said that the draft of the bill prepared by the Joint Drafting Committee will be sent to the Cabinet and will also be discussed with political parties.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

News-All-party meeting on Lokpal Bill

All-party meeting on Lokpal Bill on July 3
Centre has decided to call an all-party meeting on the third of next month to get their opinion on the draft Jan Lokpal Bill before giving it a final shape. Even after nine meetings, the civil society and the government failed to break the deadlock over certain issues. The issues include bringing the Prime Minister, higher judiciary and the Members of Parliament within the ambit of the bill among other things.
It has also been decided to present both the versions of the anti-corruption bill before the political parties. Official sources said in New Delhi yesterday that after obtaining the sense of the political parties, the bill will be presented before the Cabinet for approval. The government, however, stressed that the Bill would be placed in Parliament during the coming monsoon session.
Meanwhile, the Civil Society activists have asked the Government to relook its draft on some important aspects of the Lokpal Bill. Briefing the media in New Delhi, Mr. Anna Hazare said that they will also take up the important aspects of the Bill with the opposition and other political parties before the all party meeting next month

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

News-Monsoon Session of Parliament from August 1

Monsoon Session of Parliament from August 1
The Monsoon Session of Parliament will be held from the 1st of August to 8th September. A decision to this effect was taken at a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs headed by the Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee. Talking to Media Persons, after the meeting, Parliamentary Affairs Ministers Pawan Kumar Bansal said, the Committee decided to recommend to the President to convene the session from 1st of August.

News-UPA leaders meet to discuss Lokpal issue

UPA leaders meet to discuss Lokpal issue


A meeting of UPA leaders was held in New Delhi last night to ascertain the views of alliance partners on Lokpal Bill. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Congress President Sonia Gandhi, who is the UPA Chairperson and leaders of several of the constituents attended the meeting. Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee briefed the meeting on the discussions with Anna Hazare team on the Lokpal Bill.


DMK Parliamentary Party leader T R Balu represented the party at the meeting. DMK has favoured the Prime Minister being brought under the ambit of the Lokpal.


The UPA government is opposed to bringing the Prime Minister under the purview of the proposed anti-corruption watch-dog and virtually all allies support it on this issue.


The Government thinks bringing the office of Prime Minister under Lokpal will harm governance and could be a security risk also. The government has already announced an all party meeting on the issue which will be convened the next month.


News-Government wants strong lokpal bill


Government says it wants strong Lokpal Bill that will not disturb constitution


The government has said it wants a strong Lokpal Bill that will not disturb the constitution. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi yesterday, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal said that both the sides discussed salient features of the Bill.


He said, government will introduce a strong anti-corruption bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament as promised to the people of India. Mr. Sibal said that differences remain on six key issues which will be now taken to the all party meeting next month before sending it to the Cabinet for final approval.


Speaking on the issue, Law Minister Veerappa Moily said, the civil society activists and the government exchanged their versions on various aspects of the bill. Mr. Moily said, the government wants a robust Lokpal bill to provide corruption free government.


Earlier yesterday, the ninth and final meeting of the joint drafting committee on Lokpal Bill was held in New Delhi. Talking to reporters, civil society representative in the committee, Prashant Bhusan said, the government draft does not bring the Prime Minister, higher judiciary and conduct of MPs inside the House under the ambit of the Bill.

Monday, June 20, 2011

News-Broad consensus on draft Lok Pal Bill

Broad consensus on draft Lok Pal Bill: Sibal
The government today said that there is a broad consensus on major issues of the Lok Pal Bill after discussions with civil society members in New Delhi. Briefing the media after the 8th meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee on Lokpal, the HRD Minister, Mr. Kapil Sibal said that there is agreement on about 85 percent clauses of the bill. Describing today's meeting as a major step forward, the Minister said that the areas of divergence and differences will be discussed in the all party meeting to be convened by the Prime Minister next month. Mr. Sibal reiterated the government's commitment to introduce a strong Lok Pal Bill in the monsoon session of Parliament. He said, the discussions took place in a non acrimonious atmosphere and there was frank exchange of views between both the sides.
Briefing the media, noted lawyer Prashant Bhusan said, in tomorrow's meeting, the Civil Society and the Government Representatives will exchange their drafts to hammer out consensus on agreed issues. He said, the differences on major issues will be presented as two alternatives in a single draft to be taken up by the government at appropriate fora. In reply to a question, Mr Bhusan said, two new areas of disagreement appeared in today's meeting and they are selection and removal process of the Lokpal.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

News-Govt to discuss draft Lok Pal bill with all political parties

Government to discuss draft Lok Pal bill with all political parties

Government says it will discuss the draft Lok Pal Bill with all political parties and seek the opinion of State Chief Ministers before sending it to the Union Cabinet for approval. In an interview to Doordarshan Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal said, the agreements and disagreements on the draft will be presented before political parties. He said, after the cabinet approval, the bill will be introduced in Parliament.
In another interview to a private TV channel, Mr. Sibal said the government is opposed to bringing the post of Prime Minister under the purview of Lokpal till he demits office. He said it is not a question of an individual but an institution and asserted that no Prime Minister in office anywhere in the world has ever been prosecuted.
He also ruled out opening the conduct of MPs inside Parliament and the higher judiciary to the scrutiny of the Lokpal. He said, he is not in favour of bringing CBI and CVC under the Lok Pal and that the government is flexible on the issue of inclusion of officials below the level of Joint Secretary under the Lokpal. The Congress core committee met in New Delhi yesterday to discuss the issue of bringing the Prime Minister within the ambit of Lokpal as differences have emerged between the government and the civil society representatives on the issue.
It is understood that an all party meeting is likely to be called soon to discuss the issue. Meanwhile, Karnataka Lokayukt Santosh Hegde who is a member of the Lok Pal Bill drafting committee said in Bangaluru that he is not in favour of Anna Hazare undertaking his planned fast from Aug. 16, if a strong Lokpal Bill is not prepared.
BJP chief spokesperson Ravishankar Prasad told reporters in Patna that BJP has a categorical view on the issue of corruption but declined to answer whether his party favoured the Prime Minister being brought within the ambit of the proposed legislation.
The CPI said the draft Lok Pal bill should be circulated among the political parties for a proper debate. CPI leader D Raja said in New Delhi that once his party gets a communication, it will definitely discuss it within the party and also consult other Left parties and take a stand.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

News-President to declare her assets

President to declare her assets
President Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil has decided to declare her assets.
This is the first time that the President of the country will be making assets public although there is no law that mandates her to do it.
The decision comes close on the heels of a suggestion from the Central Information Commission that it was for the President of India to take a call on placing her and her family's property details in public domain.
Rashtrapati Bhavan spokesperson Archana Dutta said the President was not required to declare his or her assets to any public authority. However, President Patil would declare it.

News-Government to convene all party meet on lokpal

Govt likely to call all party meeting on bringing PM within Lokpal
Government is expected to call an all party meeting on the issue of bringing Prime Minister within the ambit of Lokpal as differences have emerged between government and the civil society on the issue. Sources said, the issue was discussed in the Congress Core Committee meeting today and many top leaders favoured an all party meet. The Government is prima facie opposed to the inclusion of Prime Minister within the ambit of Lokpal but is open to the idea of covering him once he demits office. The civil society representatives on the other hand, are demanding inclusion of Prime Minister as also higher judiciary in the proposed Lokpal bill. According to sources, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress party president Sonia Gandhi also discussed the Telangana issue at the core committee meeting.
Meanwhile, The BJP today said, it is not opposed to taking part in an all party meeting but will place its views on bringing the Prime Minister in the ambit of the Lokpal only after the Congress and the government circulate their views on the issue.
BJP chief spokesperson Ravishankar Prasad told reporters in Patna that BJP has a categorical view on the issue of corruption but declined to answer whether his party favoured the Prime Minister being brought within the ambit of the proposed legislation.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Political career for Indian Youth- government committed to bring strong Lokpal Bill

Government says, it is committed to bring a strong and sound Lok Pal Bill by 30th of this month to fight corruption.
The Government today said that it is committed to draft a strong and sound Lokpal Bill by 30th of this month to fight corruption. Briefing the media in New Delhi, the Home Minister Mr. P. Chidambaram said that the bill is intended to put in place a strong institution to combat corruption. He said that it is a complex bill and a holistic approach should be adopted in drafting the same. He expressed the hope that the Civil Society members in the Joint Drafting Committee will extend full cooperation in achieving the task.
Mr. Chidambaram, however, added that discussions on the issue cannot be reduced to double choices. In reply to a question the Home Minister said that laws are made by elected representatives not only from the Congress party but the entire political spectrum. When asked to comment on Mr. Anna Hazare's resolve to sit on fast again, if a weak bill is passed, Mr. Chidambaram said that fasting is not the way of drafting the bill.
Speaking on the same subject Union HRD Minister Kapil Sibal said that there are serious differences of opinion with civil society members on some aspects of the bill including the structure of the Lokpal and its jurisdiction. On the question of inclusion of Prime Minister and MPs under the ambit of the bill, the Minister said that the issue is still open for discussion as several views have emerged and they have also to consult political parties in this regard. He also clarified that no two drafts will be sent to the Cabinet but a single draft will be presented with two alternatives wherever differences of opinion persist. Taking a strong exception to the comments made by some Civil Society activists questioning the intention and motive of the government, Mr. Sibal said this is not the way to carry forward the discourse.
On the other hand, addressing the media in the capital today, Anna Hazare alleged that government is not serious about drafting a strong Lokpal bill. He also asked the government to make public the audio recordings of the Joint Draft Committee's meetings so that people can judge both the versions on bill.
On its part, Congress rejected Anna Hazare's allegations of the government being non serious in tackling corruption. Party spokesperson Jayanti Natrajan said that no government has done more than the current UPA regime.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Political Career for Indian Youth- Govt and Civil Society to present separate drafts

HRD Minister says the government and Civil Society representatives will present separate drafts of the Lok Pal bill in the next meeting.
Differences persist between government and Civil Society's representatives over vital issues concerning Lok Pal . Briefing the media after the 7th meeting of the Drafting Committee this evening, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal said that there is lack of consensus on various important aspects of the proposed Lok Pal Bill. He said in the next meeting on 20th of June, the Government and Civil Society's representatives will present separate drafts of the bill, which will then be sent to the cabinet.
Mr Sibal, however, reaffirmed that the draft will be ready by 30th of June and the bill will be presented in the Monsoon session of Parliament. On the other hand briefing the media, noted lawyer and civil society activist Prashant Bhusnan alleged that the government is not serious about enacting a strong Lok Pal Bill to fight corruption. He said, the government wants 11 member Lok Pal without investigative and vigilance machinery under it, which is not acceptable to them.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Political Career for Indian Youth- News- Lokpal Bill drafting committee meets

Lokpal Bill drafting committee to meet today


Five Union ministers, social activist Anna Hazare and other civil society members of the joint drafting Committee for Lokpal Bill will meet today ( 15.06.11) in New Delhi to take forward the process of drafting an effective legislation to combat corruption.Earlier the meeting of Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee was scheduled on 10th of this month. It was postponed on the request of Anna Hazare.
Meanwhile, Congress on Wednesday said that if civil society members in the joint drafting committee have some reservations on certain issues, they should convince the government through discussions. Talking to reporters in New Delhi party spokesperson Janardan Dwivedi said that civil society members should refrain from dictating terms to the government.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Politicalcareer for Indian Youth- News- More steps to renove Black Money

More steps to renove Black Money

Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), Prevention of Money Laundering Act( PMLA) and other indirect tax laws to curb the menace of black money. Finance Ministry officials told news persond that the committee, headed by CBDT chairman Prakash Chandra, is also likely to review the Central Excise Act. The existing Prevention of Corruption Act might be amended to suit the present day requirements.The high level committee set up to look into ways of curbing black money and its illegal transfer abroad as also its recovery wants tax evasion to be treated as a criminal offence.

Political Career for Indian Youth- News-Congress Campaign against Anna Hazare and Ramdev

Congress launches campaign against Hazare, Ramdev

The Congress launched a campaign to counter the anti-graft movement by Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev and accused a section of civil society of trying to weaken democratic institutions."The Constitution has given the power to legislate only to Parliament and the state Assemblies. If 5,000 or 6,000 people dictate from outside what the Parliament ought to do, this will weaken democracy," Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee told a press conference.Mukherjee, who released a document in English containing his party's views on the issue, said the Congress was launching an awareness campaign all over the country."The documents will be made available in other languages.Debates, discussions and seminars would be organised right from the district to the block levels to put forth our views," he said.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Government set up one more committee to trace black Money


CBDT Sets-up a Committee to Examine and Suggest Ways to Recover Income Tax Demand Classified under the Categories “Assessees not Traceable” and “No Assets/Inadequate Assets for Recovery”
In order to examine certain suggestions on Income tax Demand classified under the categories “Assessees not traceable” and “No assets/inadequate assets for Recovery”, a Committee has been constituted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) with following constitution:
i) DGIT (Admn) - Smt. Anita Kapur - Chairperson
ii) DIT (Recovery) – Smt. Sheba Bhattacharya - Member
iii) DIT(Systems)-III - Shri Harish Kumar - Member
iv) Director (ITCC) – Shri Deepak Garg - Member
v) A nominee of FIU-IND - Member
vi) Addl. DIT (Recovery) – Shri H. A. Siddiqui - Member Secretary
vii) Any other member(s) to be co-opted by the Chairperson
The modified terms and conditions of the Committee will be as follows:-
i) To suggest modalities for utilization of the information available with FIU-IND and the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) for the recovery of outstanding demand in such cases.
ii) To examine the possibilities of engaging the outside agencies to locate the whereabouts of non traceable assessees or their assets and also unknown/undisclosed assets owned by the assessees with inadequate assets vis-à-vis the outstanding demand.
iii) To propose a reward scheme for informants who supply information about such tax defaulters and which results into collection of the outstanding demand.
iv) To propose a scheme regulating such outsourcing to outside agencies for its administration by the field formation
v) To examine the feasibility and methodology of putting the names of chronic tax defaulters in public domain.
The Committee shall submit its report within two months of its constitution.
Earlier, it was noticed that there is a huge outstanding demand which is not recoverable due to the following reasons:
(i) Demand difficult to recover due to reason that assesee is not treaceable
(ii) Demand difficult to recover due to reason that no assets are available for recovery
Attempts are being made from time to time to recover this outstanding demand by using the asset and bank information available with the Finance Intelligence Unit (FIU) and Annual Information Report Data of System Directorate of Income Tax Department. The list of defaulters is also matched with the asset data available. There is a good possibility to locate some assets to realize this outstanding demand. To further achieve this objective, synergy in the functioning of Directorate of Recovery, Directorate of Systems, CBDT and Financial Intelligence Unit is also created.
Beside above, in the current wave of transparency and anti-corruption drive, there is a demand to put the list of chronic defaulters in the public domain. This will also put the onus on the taxpayers to liquidate their demand.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Government to finalize the lokpal bill by June 30

Government to introduce lokpal bill in the Monsoon session of Parliament - Says Kapil Sibal
Trouble in the Lokpal Bill drafting committee escalated on last Monday with civil society members boycotting its meeting citing "suspicious intent" of the government which hit back, saying the Anna Hazare's team was raising "extraneous" issues.
A tough-talking government asserted that the committee would continue its work to draft a strong Lokpal and finish it by June 30 for introduction in monsoon session of Parliament "whether or not someone" comes for the meetings.
The two sides were engaged in war of words as a result of which five civil society members in the committee boycotted the meeting which was attended only by the five ministers representing the government, raising questions over the joint panel.

News- Ministers to declare their assets

Prime Minister asks ministers to declare their assets including those of their spouses and dependents
The Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has asked ministers to declare their assets including those of their spouses and dependents along with any business interests, as per the annual exercise. The ministers have been asked to furnish the details by August 31st. A letter written by Cabinet Secretary K M Chandrasekhar to ministers on 2nd of this month says that this has been desired by the Prime Minister as per the Code of Conduct for ministers. He drew the attention of the ministers to the fact that the disclosure shall consist of particulars of all immovable property and the total approximate value of shares and debentures, cash holdings and jewellery. Such a statement of assets and liabilities could be in respect of the financial year for which the income tax return has already been filed by the minister. The letter also stresses the point that according to the relevant code, a minister should report the matter to the Prime Minister, or the Chief Minister as the case may be, if any member of his family sets up, or joins in the conduct and management of, any other business. A minister, including the Union Ministers, the Chief Ministers and other Ministers of State Governments, Union Territories, should not permit their spouse and dependents to accept employment under a Foreign Government, in India or abroad, or in a foreign organisation including commercial concerns without prior approval of the Prime Minister.



Monday, June 6, 2011

News-Supreme Court Seeks centre's response on Ramdev

Supreme Court Seeks Central Government's response on Baba Ramdev eviction
Taking suo motu cognisance of forceful eviction of yoga guru Baba Ramdev and his followers from the Ramlila grounds in New Delhi, the Supreme Court today sought the Centre's response on the incident. A vacation bench of justices B S Chauhan and Swatenter Kumar issued notices to the Union Home Secretary, Chief Secretary of Delhi, Delhi administration, and Delhi Police Commissioner asking them to respond within two weeks.The court asked them to reply as to what were the circumstances under which the people had to be dispersed in the midnight by the use of force. The court posted the matter for hearing in the second week of July.However, the court declined to entertain a petition filed by advocate Ajay Aggarwal on the issue. The bench expressed its displeasure that before the matter came up for hearing before it, the entire contents of the petition were leaked to the media. Meanwhile, the National Human Rights Commission on Monday issued notices to Union Home Secretary, Chief Secretary of NCT and Delhi Police Commissioner on the Police action at the gathering in Ramlila Maidan, Delhi. According to an official release, the commission has asked them to file their reply within two weeks.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

News-Police takes action against Baba Ramdev

Government says, the Yoga Guru Ramdev violated the terms of permission given by the Delhi Police for holding the Yoga shibir at Ramlila Maidan.
The government today justified police action to end Baba Ramdev's agitation against corruption in Delhi's Ramlila maidan. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, Union minister Kapil Sibal said the yoga guru had violated the undertaking for permission and had even backed out on his assurances to end fast yesterday. Mr. Sibal, who was holding negotiations with Ramdev over the last few days, said there were apprehensions about law and order situation in Delhi. Mr Sibal said 50,000 people were at Ramlila Maidan although Ramdev had sought permission for a yoga camp for a gathering of 5,000 only.
As far as we are concerned the issue that were raised and these are issue in the public domain which we are addressing even in dealing with the Lokpal Bill, issues in relation to corruption, issue in relation how to deal with corruption at high places and of course as far as Swami Ramdev's agenda was concern it was even broader than that. We set out in writing in clear terms that what the government is doing and he publicly stated that 90 per cent of the demands have been met and this is exactly why he gave a written undertaking and this written undertaking came from him that commitment was by the afternoon of yesterday he will give up his tap because they was no question of fasting committed that you would only do a tap than in the afternoon he did not do so.
The Delhi Police today registered a case against unnamed persons on charges of rioting in connection with the Baba Ramdev-led protest at Ramlila Maidan in the National Capital. Talking to our correspondent, Delhi Police spokesman Rajan Bhagat said the case was registered at Kamla Market police station against unidentified people on charges of rioting, preventing public servants from discharging duties and damaging public property. Police sources said, Ramdev has been banned from entering Delhi for 15 days. Reacting to the development, Congress leader Digvijay Singh justified the action against Baba Ramdev. Mr Singh accused him of inciting people despite striking a deal with the government for ending his protest. Mr Singh also demanded an inquiry into the thousands of crores of rupees of property owned by Ramdev.
\BJP has criticised the police action. Addressing newsmen in Lucknow today, BJP President Nitin Gadkari alleged that Congress is not ready to discuss corruption issue through democratic means. Replying to questions, he said the issue of corruption should not be politicised. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha leader Sushma Swaraj condemned the happenings at Ramlila Maidan. Speaking to AIR, senior CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta wondered why a yoga guru like Baba Ramdev has sought to become an exponent against corruption. Addressing his followers on arrival at his Ashram in Haridwar today Baba Ramdev said, his Satyagraha against Black Money' would continue. Meanwhile, leader of Opposition in Uttarakhand Assembly Harak Singh Rawat briefing the media persons in Dehradhun made allegation of corruption against Baba Ramdev and demanded a high level inquiry against him and his Ashram.

Friday, June 3, 2011

news-Govt fails to break Baba fast

Govt fails to break Baba Ramdev's fast
After a five-hour marathon meeting, the Union government and Baba Ramdev failed to reach a compromise on the demands raised by the yoga guru, who said he will launch his indefinite fast as planned.Emerging from the meeting at a hotel in New Delhi, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal said the two sides had constructive dialogue on several matters and they are very happy with the progress but these issues cannot be resolved in a day."We have yet not reached a compromise and I will sit on fast" Ramdev said after his meeting with Sibal and and Subodh Kant Sahai.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh also briefed President Pratibha Patil on the deliberations.Sibal said the government has responded positively to the Baba's suggestions and hoped that Ramdev will do "what is right".

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Political Career for Indian Youth- Lokpal Bills 2010-11 Comparision

The Draft Lokpal Bill 2010 and the Jan Lokpal Bill 2011
Jurisdiction, Powers and Functions of the Proposed Lokpal
A Quick Comparison
Prepared by
Justice A P Shah
Chief Justice (Retd), Delhi High Court, New Delhi

&
Venkatesh Nayak
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi &
Co-Convenor, National Campaign for People’s Right to Information
(April 2011)
Even as the Joint Committee set up by the Government of India prepares itself for drafting a Bill to establish the institution of the Lokpal (Ombudsperson cum Anti-Corruption Agency) in India, as a preparatory step towards public debate it is important to examine the contents of the draft Bills currently available in the public domain. This brief note compares the jurisdiction, powers and functions of the Lokpal as envisaged in the draft Bills prepared by the Government of India and civil society actors. The text of the Government’s Lokpal Bill 2010 was circulated through the email circuit prior to the public consultation organised by the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information in Delhi on 3rd April 2011. The draft Jan Lokpal Bill (version 2.2) is obtained from the civil society actors working tirelessly on the subject. This comparative picture is prepared with the objective of encouraging informed debate on this important subject. This is not a qualitative assessment of the provisions contained in either draft Bill.
The Lokpal Bill, 2010
Jurisdiction:

Who is covered?

Public functionaries such as the Prime Minister (except for matters relating to national security, maintenance of public order, national defence and foreign relations), Ministers, Ministers of State, Deputy Ministers and Members of Parliament. [Clause (2)(h)]
Who is not covered?

The President of India, the Vice President, the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker, Lok Sabha (House of the People) Deputy Chairperson, Rajya Sabha (Council of States), Chief Justice of India, Chief Justices of the High Courts, Justices of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, the Attorney General of India, the Chairperson and Members of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)(2), the Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissioners, Chairperson and Members of the Union Public Service Commission, any constitutional authority and all bureaucrats. [Clause 28]
Functions:
1. Lokpal can inquire into only such complaints as may be referred by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha or the President of India. [Clauses 12 & 13]
2. Lokpal is required to inform the complainant and the competent authority about the findings of an inquiry into a complaint. [Clause 17]
3. Lokpal must submit annual reports to the President of India.
4. Lokpal cannot inquire into complaints received directly from citizens. Bureaucrats cannot make any complaints against public functionaries. [Clauses 10 & 12 ]
5. Lokpal cannot initiate action suo motu.
6. Lokpal is forbidden from inquiring into complaints relating to matters that are more than five years old. [Clause 13]
Powers:

Lokpal has the:
1. power to compulsorily collect fees from a complainant in a case; [Clause 12]
2. power to dismiss complaints after recording reasons in writing and inform the complainant; [Clause 13]
3. power to issue orders for safe custody of documents; [Clause 14]
4. power to order in camera hearings in exceptional circumstances; [Clause 14(2)]
5. power to define procedure for conducting inquiry into complaints received; [Clause 14]
6. powers of civil court to summon persons, to require discovery and production of documents, receiving affidavits, examining witnesses etc; [Clause 15]
7. powers to cause search and seizure of documents; [Clause 16]
8. power to initiate defamation proceedings under Section 199, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973; [Clause 19]
9. power to detain an offender who insults the Lokpal, summarily try him or her and award a sentence of up to one month imprisonment and/or a fine of Rs. 500; [Clause 20]
10. power to compensate the public functionary complained against from the fees deposited by the complainant; [Clause 21]
11. power to order reward or compensation to the complainant in fit cases; [Clause 21]
12. power to take cognizance of false or mala fide complaints, summarily try such cases and sentence the offender to a prison term of at least one year extendable up to three years and or fine of Rs. 50,000; [Clause 21]
13. power to delegate functions to officers of the Lokpal and other agencies except the powers of receiving complaints, dismissing complaints, trying offenders for false or mala fide complaints; [Clause 26] and
14. Lokpal and its officers have immunity from legal proceedings for action taken in good faith [Clause 24].
The Jan Lokpal Bill, 2011
Jurisdiction:
Who is covered?
Public servants such as the Prime Minister, Ministers, Ministers of State, Deputy Ministers Members of Parliament, judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, government servants, Chairperson and members of a local authority (panchayats and municipalities), statutory corporations established by or under any law made by parliament, cooperative societies, government companies, members of any committee or Board whether statutory or non-statutory constituted by the Central Government and all government servants under the Central Government. A member of a private entity, if found to be involved in a case inquired into or investigated by the Lokpal falls within its jurisdiction. [Clauses 2(11), (5) & 8(2)(b)]
Who is not covered?
The President of India, the Vice President and the Speaker, Lok Sabha. [Clause 17]
What is not covered?

Lokpal is barred from investigating a case of grievance in respect of any action-
a) if the complainant has not availed himself or herself of any remedy available in any other law;
b) in respect of any action taken by a quasi-judicial body unless the complainant alleges mala fides;
c) if the entire matter is pending before a court or quasi-judicial body of competent jurisdiction; and
d) if there is an inordinate and inexplicable delay in filing the grievance. [Clause 17]
Functions:
1. Lokpal to receive, inquire and or investigate complaints about acts of commission or omission punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. [Clause 8 (1)]
2. Lokpal to receive, inquire and or investigate complaints where there are allegations of misconduct by a government servant. [Clause 8 (1)]
3. Lokpal to receive, inquire and or investigate complaints from whistleblowers. [Clause 8 (1)]
4. Lokpal to receive, inquire and or investigate complaints against its own staff. [Clause 8 (1)]
5. Lokpal must ensure the integrity of its own staff and employees. [Clause 8 (1A)]
6. Lokpal to submit a consolidated report on its performance to the President of India. The President to cause laying of the report on the table of both Houses of Parliament. [Clause 11]
7. Lokpal to publish every month the list of cases disposed with brief details of every case, outcome and action taken or proposed to be taken, list of cases received during the previous month and list of pending cases. [Clause 11(3)]
8. Lokpal to put on its website all records related to a case after the completion of the inquiry or investigation. Information that will not be disclosed includes the identity of a complainant who has requested confidentiality and anything that may threaten the internal and external security of the country. [Clause 30A]
9. Lokpal to conduct annual integrity audit of each department as per guidelines it may lay down from time to time. [Clause 21B]
10. Lokpal to select, appoint and transfer Chief Vigilance Officers in all public authorities. [Clause 22]
11. Lokpal to compare the property statements of candidates contesting election to Parliament filed with the Election Commission of India with the information available with the Income Tax Department within three months after every election. Proceedings to be initiated in deserving cases. [Clause 28B]
12. Lokpal to create public awareness about this law. [Clause 31A]
13. Lokpal to prepare an appropriate scheme to give financial rewards to complainants under this law. [Clause 31B]
14. Lokpal to make its own Regulations. There is no requirement of laying the Regulations on the table of the Houses of Parliament for the purpose of approval or modification. [Clause 34]
Powers:

Powers relating to inquiry and investigation:
Lokpal (Chairperson, members, officers and staff) is to be a deemed police officer. Lokpal has the same powers as granted to superior police officers under Section 36 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.(2)This will include powers of arrest. [Clauses 3(1), 12 & 25].
Lokpal is to be deemed a designated authority under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for the purpose of phone tapping and interception of messages including those sent through the Internet. [Clause 13C]
1. Power to conduct preliminary inquiry and/or full investigation into a complaint received from any person about corruption, misconduct, harassment of whistleblowers and errant Lokpal staff. [Clauses 8 & 18]
2. Power to initiate suo motu action to inquire into any matter relating to offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, misconduct of government servants, whistleblowers and its own erring staff. [Clause 8(3)]
3. Power to inquire or investigate cases forwarded by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India after submission of its annual report to Parliament. [Clause 15(2A)]
4. Power to close a case if the complaint is not made out. [Clause 8(2)(a)]
5. Power to investigate any offence under any other law if related to the original case under investigation. [Clause 12(2)]
6. Power to issue search warrant to an officer not below the rank of Inspector of Police in relation to an ongoing inquiry or investigation. This warrant will be deemed to have been issued by a court of competent jurisdiction under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. [Clause 9]
7. Power to order seizure of any property found during the search. [Clause 9]
8. Power to issue order for the safe custody of documents relevant to an investigation. [Clause 16(ii)]
9. Powers of civil court available during a preliminary inquiry or investigation to summon and enforce attendance of any person and examine him or her under oath; require the discovery and production of any document, receive evidence on affidavit, requisition any public record from any court or office. [Clause 10]
10. Powers to approve interception and monitoring of messages of data and voice transmitted through telephones, internet or any other medium under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with the Information Technology Act, 2000. [Clause 13C]
11. Power to investigate any action taken with the general or specific approval of a public servant where a complaint involving a grievance or allegation is made in respect of such action. Such investigation may be launched suo motu or upon a reference received from the Government of India if such action in the recorded opinion of the Lokpal can be or could have been the subject of a grievance or allegation. [Clause 16]
12. Power to make public all documents relating to a case that has been closed by the Lokpal after preliminary inquiry or investigation. All information to be provided to any person making a request under the Right to Information Act, 2005. [Clause 16 (i)(a)]
13. Power to ensure videography of all hearings before the Lokpal and to make available copies to any member of the public on payment of copying costs. However in exceptional circumstances in camera hearings are allowed. [Clauses 16(i)(b) & 16(ii)(c)]
14. Power to protect the identity of the complainant on a specific request. [Clause 16(i)(c)]
Prosecutorial powers:
1. Power to prosecute offenders in designated courts under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without the requirement of sanction from the Government under that law or under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. [Clauses 8(6) & (7)]
2. Power to initiate prosecution against private entities that are parties to an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. [Clause 8(2)(b)]
3. Full bench of the Lokpal to grant permission for prosecution. [Clause 14(5)(i)]
4. Power to initiate prosecution against a public servant who does not comply with the requirement of filing annual statements of assets and liabilities to the Head of the Department under Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code. [Clause 28(4)]
Powers to ensure compliance:
Lokpal to have the powers of a High Court to ensure compliance with its orders. [Clause 13(4)]. The draft Bill seeks to amend the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to give this power and authority to the Lokpal. [Clause 13(4)].
1. Power to impose a fine on officials responsible for not complying with its orders and to direct the Drawing and Disbursing Officer of the Department to deduct the fine as specified in its order. No minimum or upper limit for fine is mentioned. [Clause 13]
2. Power to penalise the Drawing and Disbursing Officer for not complying with the order of deduction of fine. [Clause 13(3)]
Power of appeal:
Power to hear appeals when cases are closed by its own officials. [Clause 14(5)(iii]
Extraordinary powers:
Any proceedings before the Lokpal is deemed to be a judicial proceeding.
1. Power to order cancellation or modification of a license or lease or permission or contract or agreement which was the subject matter of the investigation. [Clause 8(2)(d)]
2. Power to blacklist a concerned firm or company or contractor or any other entity involved in the act of corruption. [Clause 8(2)(e)]
3. Power to issue directions to appropriate authorities for redress of grievances. [Clause 8(2)(f)]
4. Power to issue interim orders during preliminary inquiry or full investigation, recommending that the public authority stay the implementation or enforcement of a decision or action complained against or take such mandatory preventive action on such terms and conditions as the Lokpal may specify to prevent further harm from taking place. [Clause 16(iv)]
5. Power to issue interim orders during the preliminary inquiry or full investigation recommending the suspension or transfer of a government servant. [Clause 18(vi)]
6. Power to issue interim orders during the preliminary inquiry or full investigation recommending safeguarding public property from wastage or damage likely to be caused by the acts of the public servant. [Clause 18(vii)]
7. Right to move the appropriate High Court for seeking appropriate directions to be issued to a public authority that does not comply with a recommendation contained in an interim order issued by the Lokpal. [Clause 18]
8. Power to order removal of a public servant from his or her post at the end of an investigation. In the case of Ministers and MPs recommendation for removal will be made to the President of India. President may accept or reject the recommendation within a month. [Clause 18(viii)]
9. Power to take action for the protection of whistleblowers. [Clause 8(2)(h)]
10. Power to recommend imposition of appropriate penalties under the Civil Service Conduct Rules including power to recommend dismissal of a government servant if convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. These recommendations are binding on the Government and must be implemented within a week. [Clauses 8(2)(c) & 8(5)]
11. Power to recommend appointment of judges for the purpose of trying cases investigated by the Lokpal. Government must comply with this recommendation within three months. [Clause 13A]
12. Right to be consulted by the Government on the procedure to be followed in the selection of judges to ensure integrity of the candidates. [Clause 13A]
13. Power to order payment of compensatory cost in respect of a vexatious, false claim or defence. [Clause 10(2)]
14. Power to order cost for causing delay. [Clause 10(2)]
15. Power to issue Letters Rogatory in any pending case. [Clause 13B]
16. Power to impose penalties on government servants who issued threats to or caused the victimisation of a whistleblower. [Clause 20(2)]
17. Power to confiscate the properties of a public servant who fails to provide a satisfactory reply as to why such properties were not declared in the annual statement of assets and liabilities submitted to the head of the department. [Clause 28A]
18. Power to impose fines on complainants who file complaints without any basis or evidence and in the opinion of the Lokpal is intended to harass certain authorities. Fine may be up to Rs. 1 lakh. [Clause 31]
19. Power to initiate proceedings against candidates who contested parliamentary elections if their assets and liabilities statements do not match with the information available with the Income Tax Department. [Clause 28A]
20. Power to receive one half of the properties confiscated from public servant for the purposes of meeting the expenses of its own administration. [Clause 28A(8)]
21. Power to approve Rules proposed to be made under this law by the Central Government. There is no requirement of laying the Rules on the table of the Houses of Parliament for the purpose of approval or modification. [Clause 32(1)]
Administrative powers:

1. Lokpal to function in benches of three or more members constituted randomly by computer. Each bench must have one member with legal background. [Clause 14(4)]
2. Power to hear complaints against its own staff. [Clause 14(3)(ii)]
3. Power to lay down norms categorising cases that may be dealt with by the members of Lokpal and those to be dealt with by Chief Vigilance Officers or Vigilance Officers. [Clause 14(5)(iv)]
4. Power to make rules for the receipt and disposal of complaints from whistleblowers. [Clause 20(5)]
5. Power to decide the number of categories of officers and employees required for its functioning, their recruitment, conditions of service, payscales, allowances and special pay, if any. [Clause 23]
6. Power to requisition the services of any officer or investigating agency of the Central Government or any other Government or any private person or any other agency. [Clause 23(4)]
7. Power of administrative and disciplinary control over any officer whose services may be requisitioned and obtained by the Lokpal under this law. [Clause 23(5)]
8. Power of administrative and disciplinary control over the Delhi Special Police Establishment which will stand transferred to the Lokpal and become its investigation wing. [Clause 25]
9. Transfer of all cases already being handled by the Delhi Special Police Establishment and the Central Vigilance Commission as on the date of enactment. [Clauses 24 & 25]
10. Officers of the investigation wing will have the same powers of arrest and other such powers as is given to the Delhi Special Police Establishment. [Clause 25]
11. Power to select, appoint and transfer Chief Vigilance Officers in all public authorities under the Government of India. [Clause 22]
Powers to protect whistleblowers:

1. Power to issue directions to the appropriate authorities to prevent victimisation of a whistleblower who makes a complaint under this law or files an information request under the Right to Information Act, 2005. [Clause 20(2)]
2. Power to direct the police to provide adequate security to a whistleblower and to register a criminal case against those who threaten or victimise the whistleblower. The responsibility of providing protection to whistleblowers may be delegated to Vigilance Officers. [Clauses 20(2)(a) & 20(2(dc)]
3. Power to hold its own officers responsible for criminal dereliction of duty or connivance or both if the person who makes a complaint under this law is assaulted. [Clause 20(2)(dd)]
4. Power to order the appropriate authorities to withdraw a case filed against whistleblower on the basis of inquiries conducted by the Lokpal. [Clause 20(2)(da)]
Powers of Oversight:

1. Power to issue directions from time to time to appropriate authorities so as to change their work practices, administration and other systems in order to reduce the scope and possibility for corruption, misconduct, public grievances and whistleblower victimisation. [Clause 8(4)]
2. Power to monitor the progress of investigation into offences alleged by the complainant to have been committed under any law other than the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 but in relation to the original complaint made under this law. [Clause 20(2)(g)]
3. Power to issue directions from time to time to appropriate authorities so as to prevent recurrence of victimisation of whistleblowers. [Clause 20(4)]
4. Power to issue directions to any public authority to make changes in its Citizens Charter (directions must be approved by a three member bench). Public authority to comply with such orders within a week. [Clause 21(5)]
5. Power to appoint Chief Vigilance Officers in every public authority. [Clause 22(1)]
Clauses involving the judiciary or affecting its powers:
1. A bench to hear a petition for removal of the Chairperson or a member of the Lokpal will consist of five senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. [Clause 7(3)(e)](3)
2. The Supreme Court cannot dismiss petitions for removal of the Chairperson or a member of the Lokpal in liminae. [Clause 7(3)(f)](4)
3. Chairperson of the Lokpal to deal with complaints against judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court. Screening of the complaint to be done by a member of the Lokpal who will present the findings to the full bench of the Lokpal. [Clause 19B]
4. Registration of a case against a judge of the Supreme Court or the High Courts to be done only with the approval of a full bench of the Lokpal where 2/3rds of the members have legal background. [Clause 19B]
5. Such cases are to be investigated by police officers above the rank of Superintendent of Police. [Clause 19B]
6. A decision to prosecute a judge of the Supreme Court or the High Courts will require the approval of a full bench of the Lokpal where 2/3rds of the members have legal background. [Clause 19B]


1. Since 2004 this Commission has been bifurcated into separate National Commissions, one for SCs and the other for STs.
2. Section 36: “Powers of superior officers of police.– Police Officers superior in rank to an officer in charge of a police station may exercise the same powers throughout the local area to which they are appointed, as may be exercised by such officer within the limits of the station.”
3. This clause overrides the power of the Supreme Court to make rules in consultation with the President of India as to the number of judges who are to sit for any purpose under Article 145(2) of the Constitution.
4. This clause overrides the inherent powers of the Supreme Court.

Political Career for Indian Youth- Jan Lokpal Bill- Theme-7 Drafting Errors

Issues for Consideration and Recommendations for Improvement
Theme 7: Drafting Errors
Issue 1: No ouster clause attached to Clause 28(4)

Clause 28(4) in the Draft Bill seeks to make submission of property statements a statutory obligation for all government servants. It also seeks to empower the proposed Lokpal to initiate prosecution against errant public servants in the event of non-compliance. While this is a welcome measure this provision is not linked to an ouster clause that bars the operation of Section 197 of the CrPC. Under Section 197 no court may take cognizance of an offence without the previous sanction of the appropriate Government. The ouster clause contained in Clause 8(7) earlier in the text states that it is applicable to all proceedings initiated under the Act. However that Clause ought to have been placed in the last part of the Draft Bill under the chapter relating to Miscellaneous provisions. This would ensure that arguments about general law and special law and earlier law and later law are not launched in a bid to scuttle the intent of Clause 8(7) vis-à-vis Clause 28(4).
Recommendation:
The ouster clause contained in Clause 8(7) may be placed in the Chapter on Miscellaneous provisions to avoid unnecessary confusion.

Issue 2: Exercise of the powers of delegated legislation

Clause 32 empowers the Central Government to make Rules to carry out the provisions of this Act when adopted. However the Rules can be made only after obtaining the approval of the proposed Lokpal. This requirement is contrary to principles of delegated legislation. A Government’s power to make Rules under an Act cannot be fettered in this manner. However there is no harm in requiring the Central Government to consult with the Lokpal prior to notifying the final version of the Rules. This is in fact desirable. The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill, 2010 requires the Central Government to consult with the Chief Justice of India before making Rules under its provisions. The making of Rules is not contingent upn securing the approval of the Chief Justice.
Recommendation:
In the proviso under Clause 32(1) of the Draft Bill, the words: “and” and “approval of” occurring after the words: “made only in consultation” may be dropped.
Issue 3: Make Rules and Regulations after prior publication

The Draft Bill does not contain any requirement for consulting the people while making Rules and Regulations. This is contrary to the very process that has informed the drafting of the Bill itself. When the main law is drafted in consultation with people, there is no reason why subsidiary legislation must not involve public consultations. Section 23 of the General Clauses Act contains a procedure for notifying Rules and Regulations after prior publication. This procedure enables people to participate in the rule making process and ensures that people exercise oversight over excessive use of delegated powers to the detriment of the letter and spirit of the principal Act. Under this procedure people will have the opportunity for suggesting amendments to the draft rules and regulations before they are operationalised.
Recommendation:
Clauses 32 and 34 may be amended to require prior publication of the Rules and Regulations notified under the law.
Issue 4: Absence of laying requirements for Rules, Regulations and Orders

The Draft Bill does not require that the Rules, Regulations and Clarificatory orders notified by the Government or the proposed Lokpal to be tabled in Parliament for modification, if necessary. Laying of subsidiary legislation in both Houses of Parliament is essential for Parliament to exercise oversight on the actions of delegatees. If enabling provisions are not incorporated in a Bill delegated legislation will escape parliamentary scrutiny and deprive Parliament of an opportunity to annul or modify Rules and Regulations that are contrary to the spirit of the principal Act.
Recommendation:
Clauses 32, 33 and 34 may be amended to include laying provisions for Rules, Regulations and Clarificatory orders using the standard formula. (See Section 29 of the RTI Act)

Issue 5: Overriding effect of the law

Clause 35 of the Draft Bill states that it will override all other laws in their entirety. This is contrary to established practice. As it deals with a specific category of criminal offences this law must be subject to the safeguards in the CrPC. Therefore it is advisable to give this law an overriding effect on other laws only to the extent of inconsistency.
Recommendation:
Clause 35 may be substituted with the following:
“The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act.”

Issue 6: Minor drafting errors need to be ironed out
There are several drafting errors in the Draft Bill. Some glaring examples are as follows:
a) Clause 6(1) states that the President shall appoint the Chairperson and the Members of the Lokpal. However earlier in the Draft Bill Clause 3(4) states that the Government shall appoint the Chairperson and members of the first Lokpal within six months of enactment. This amounts to contradiction as to who will appoint the first Lokpal.
b) Clause 3 does not differentiate between the ‘establishment’ and the ‘constitution’ of the Lokpal. The Government will have to first create the institution of the Lokpal through a gazette notification. Then the members will have to be appointed. These sub-clauses need to be differently worded. Sections 12 and 15 of the RTI Act can provide guidance in this regard.
c) Clause 6(8)(a) states that the selection committee will select a five member search committee comprising of former C&AGs and Chief Election Commissioners (CEC). At any given point of time only one person will be functioning as the CEC. This clause needs to be amended to include the term ‘former’ before the words: “Chief Election Commissioners.”
d) Clause 6(8)(d) makes for convoluted reading. The ostensible purpose of this Clause is to provide for situations such as the appointment of a person as Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission. The eligible candidate must have served as the Chief Justice of India. However this sense is not properly conveyed by this Clause in its current formulation.
e) The Draft Bill’s provisions are loosely worded in several places. For example Clause 31(2) states as follows: “Such fines shall be recoverable as dues under Land Revenue Act.” Laws relating to land revenue differ from State to State and have different names. This clause may be redrafted to state as follows: “Fines imposed under this section shall be recovered in the manner of arrears of land revenue.”